UXDE dot Net

Downsides of Shared Web Hosting

By -

Shared web hosting usually refers to a type of web hosting in which many websites exist in a single web-server linked to the internet. It is also called as virtual hosting or derive-host service, where a single physical server and its allocated resources are shared among many users on mutual consent.

In shared hosting, each website will be allocated its own partition/section in order to separate it from other websites. This is usually one of the most economical choices for web hosting as many individuals share the total expenditure of server maintenance. If you searching for cheap and reliable web hosting services, then shared hosting is suggested for beginners.

Articles Related to Shared Hosting

Advantages of Shared Hosting

The greatest benefit of shared hosting is its inexpensive price, which is even the influential factor for many buyers. Another major advantage is that there is no need for you to carry out technical maintenance on the shared server whenever you are running programs.

Close to 90-percent of all small websites shared web hosting serves as the accurate solution, and the main reason for this being it is cheaper, and also does not include any complex Linux management skills.

All shared web hosting suppliers provide their facilities in the form of a user friendly web-based control panel with which all website owners can easily upload content to their respective sites, create accounts, emails, and their database.


It saves some good amount of time on maintenance concerns, and completely eliminates the extra efforts as somebody else is responsible for taking care of the shared server maintenance, and for that very reason, it is considered to be the best preferred option for all small websites.

Disadvantages of Shared Hosting

In this section, we will discuss about some of the most commonly reported downsides of shared hosting.

The biggest problem with the shared hosting services is the inadequate resources at your dumping. Sharing a server is nothing but sharing the system assets with many other users on a single physical machine (server), and as a result each user obtains more limiting service.

For instance, if in case any of the users in a shared web hosting service consume a huge amount of traffic, email capabilities, or CPU power, then the other users on the same physical server are most likely to experience the nastiest shared web hosting performance.

Another major downside is not being able to set-up programs and modules on the common server that you require in order to run your personal website and related scripts.

Furthermore, there are extremely high chances of getting hacked, and your website being compromised in case any of the websites on shared server get infected with a malware. Consequently, even if there are no security loop-holes in your website, you may have to bear adverse consequences, just for hosting it on a shared server.

At the same time, shared hosting also offers the pricing advantage, and getting a dedicated server is almost 7-10 x times costlier than a shared hosting package, making it a popular option amongst the webmasters and small business owners.

Siddartha is a Blogger from India. He is currently working as a Java Front End developer and he loves writing about tutorials, technology, algorithm, etc. You can follow him on Twitter | Facebook | Google+. You can subscribe to GadgetCage RSS Feed or Email Notifications.

8 Comments to Downsides of Shared Web Hosting

  1. I switched from Godaddy to Dreamhost last year. Still shared server but have around 10 sites on it and all of them are still pretty darn fast. Godaddy is a rip off in my opinion as they are expensive and charge per site and the sites run super slow.

  2. I have been on shared hosting for many years, and I am SO thankful that I have not suffered one single problem. That being said I do realize that I fall into the minority and must just be very lucky. I hear horror stories constantly about shared hosting. I am always feeling the urge to move to dedicated but the costs are just insane, although well worth it, Im sure. I guess I should say that the one fallback I have noticed is fluctuation in performance and speed of the server. And of course if your website happens to be on a shared server with many adult sites or sites with questionable content it can also have an effect on your website integrity. Thanks for the article and information ! You have a great website !

  3. It is all about who you are sharing with. If you’re sharing with a lot of websites that are resource hungry then your website will suffer. I always recommend paying a little more for hosting as Google are now taking website load speed into account when page ranking websites.

  4. The price is definitely the driving factor for shared hosting. When I first started out, I was only a student so I had to save money wherever possible and went for shared hosting. But once I had a job, I switched to a dedicated server for the freedom and security it provides.


  5. My experience only be on a shared hosting when your blog or site doesnt cross 5k users a day.If it crosses the border then directly go to a Dedi dont even go for a vps.If you cant afford a Dedi then go for a vps but make sure you take some server admins to fully optimize it to handle atleast 20k/day.

    This is what i experienced from my past.Hope fully this will be helpfull for some of you guys

    Have a nice day

  6. Well I would like to share we had a blog which used to bring in 10$> every day but because of some poor niche site on same host server which was penalized all my content also went waste.. so always go for vps..

  7. For me Shared hosting is great because of its price. Even for a moderate site , its can handle good amount of traffic.

    Biggest con is speed and security.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *